|
Post by richg072 on Jan 29, 2013 8:52:53 GMT -5
Was wondering how most guys go in regards to having pelts with or with out feet when getting a animal tanned for keeping? Is it just a personal preference or is there more to deciding feet or no feet?
|
|
|
Post by ambowpk on Jan 29, 2013 8:59:45 GMT -5
My fox and coyote I kept the feet on. I like the look.
|
|
|
Post by rusty on Jan 29, 2013 9:31:16 GMT -5
Other than the cost for life size it's all in what you want
|
|
cooper67
#2 Newhouse
oswego county trappers ,nysta,jefferson county
Posts: 2,554
|
Post by cooper67 on Jan 29, 2013 16:24:50 GMT -5
personal prefference. on all my canines i try to leave the feet on if they are not damaged,as i sell to a speciality buyer for animals with the feeet on.that is the way they want them to sell on ebay.
|
|
|
Post by silverfox on Jan 30, 2013 5:45:30 GMT -5
personal preference if keeping for yourself, if trying to cater/sell to the taxidermy market then def leave feet on
|
|
|
Post by richg072 on Jan 30, 2013 22:37:51 GMT -5
Ok, thanks guys. Couldn't get a good look at the difference when you google image both so Guess its something you have to see in person.
|
|
cooper67
#2 Newhouse
oswego county trappers ,nysta,jefferson county
Posts: 2,554
|
Post by cooper67 on Feb 1, 2013 17:26:00 GMT -5
some times its best to go to a auction and look on the tables to see what animal with feet on and ones off look like as tanned they will pretty much look the same.
|
|